Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).

• Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
• Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.

In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribute extra to the discussion.

The consequentialist moral reasoning base the morality of an action on the consequences or effect of the action. An action is said to be morally good if it produces good effect or consequence. In contrast, an action