Navigation » List of Schools, Subjects, and Courses » History 111 – The Women in America » Discussions » Module 1 – DQ #3 » Module 1 – DQ #3 Sample Answers
We are showing you only the excerpt of our answer. If you need help with the complete answer email us at 
Module 1 – DQ #3
- What is the difference between a primary source and a secondary source?
- Why are primary sources important in the study of history? What problems or pitfalls are there in analyzing primary sources? Are they always 100% correct just because they’re old?
- List the 5 Cs of historical thinking. Which one do you think would be most useful to you if you were trying to understand something in the past? Why? (There’s no wrong answer to the second part. It’s your opinion.)
Module 1 – DQ #3 Answer
The difference between a primary source and the secondary source would certainly be where they originate from. According to the webpage from UNSW on “Primary and Secondary Sources,” primary sources are first-hand accounts of what has happened. In other words, these are the reports themselves of what has transpired. A few examples of this would include biographies, interviews, speeches, documents from the government, and such. The same webpage from UNSW also explained that the secondary sources are derived from the primary sources.
This question is taken from History 111 – The Women in America » Fall 2021 » Discussions