Navigation » List of Schools, Subjects, and Courses » English 104 – Argumentation and Critical Thinking » Discussions » 1984 Discussion – Part II, Chapters 6-9 » 1984 Discussion – Part II, Chapters 6-9 Sample Answers
1984 Discussion – Part II, Chapters 6-9
Here are the discussion questions for Part II, Chapters 6-9:
GROUP #1
- Find the slippery slope fallacy that’s mentioned in Chapter 6. Identify and explain. Hint: it’s near the end of the chapter.
- Near the end of Chapter 7, Julia says, “They can make you say anything – anything– but they can’t make you believe it. They can’t get inside you.” Contextualize this quote. Do you agree/disagree with her claim?
GROUP #2
- Winston is ecstatic when O’Brien finishes the lyric of the old rhyme he keeps replaying in his mind? Why does the completion of the lyric make him so happy? Consult the end of Chapter 8.
- What is the non sequitur fallacy apparent in the beginning seven paragraphs of Chapter 9? Identify and explain.
GROUP #3
- In Chapter 9, we are told by Goldstein’s book that all 3 regions are essentially equal to one another and that it benefits them to be in war. Explain the deductive reasoning apparent in that explanation.
- In Chapter 9, we learn that the three superpowers have one thing in common. What is it and what does this suggest about the ongoing war they are waging against one another? Explain.
GROUP #4
- Draw a diagram of the societal structure of Oceania (as Goldstein describes it) from most to least powerful.
- According to Goldstein’s book, why are the new rulers of Oceania so successful? Provide at least two reasons.
GROUP #5
- What is crimestop and how does it relate to critical thinking (consult Chapter 9, near the end).
- Although it is nowhere near as apparent, there are still signs of doublethink in our current society. Think of an example and explain.
1984 Discussion – Part II, Chapters 6-9 Answer
1. The capacity to acquire an instinct for stopping and not allowing hazardous thoughts to enter your head is referred to as crimestop. To put it another way, accepting things without questioning or scrutinizing them. It ties to Party’s symbolism of controlling one’s brain processes in order to accept conflicting notions instinctively rather than thinking about them. For example, accepting that the Party and Big Brother are wonderful but still acknowledging that they are flawed.