Navigation » List of Schools, Subjects, and Courses » Art 315 – World Perspectives in Art History » Discussions » Research Project3–Discussion Post IV
With Answers Good news! We are showing you only an excerpt of our suggested answer to this question. Should you need our help in customizing an answer to this question, feel free to send us an email at 
or chat with our customer service representative.
Research Project3–Discussion Post IV
Question
Research Project3–Discussion Post IV
- ART THAT INFURIATES DISCUSSION
- Read the New York Times article “Should Art That Infuriates Be Removed? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/arts/design/emmett-till-whitney-biennial-schutz.html (Links to an external site.) (or “Should Art That Angers Remain on View?” https://www.proquest.com/docview/1881355764?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=7285 (Links to an external site.) ) and “The Ten Most Controversial Art Projects of the Last Century”: https://news.artnet.com/exhibitions/top-10-controversial-art-projects-563213 (Links to an external site.)
- In your post, respond to all of the prompts below. Write in essay form.
- What is your opinion of these controversial works of art? In particular comment on Dana Schutz’ painting of Emmett Till which created quite a controversy when it was exhibited at the Whitney Museum in New York last
- Comment on at least 2 other artworks mentioned in these articles. Make sure that at least one is from each of the articles. What is your reaction to them? Don’t forget to provide the title (in italics) and the artist’s name when referring to the specific
- Where you aware that works of art could be so controversial? Do you find them shocking? Should they be removed from public institutions (museums, )?
This question is taken from Art 315 – World Perspectives in Art History » Fall 2021 » Discussions